NATION

Supreme Court considers Obama health care overhaul

Comment
Decrease Increase Text size

During the hearing, the questions came so quickly at times that the justices interrupted each other.

Demonstrators are gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the high court is considering President Obama's health care overhaul. (Photo: Scott Thuman)

At one point, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sotomayor started speaking at the same time.Chief Justice John Roberts, acting as traffic cop, signaled Ginsburg to go first, perhaps in a nod to her seniority.

Only Justice Clarence Thomas, as is his custom, stayed out of the fray.

Attorney General Eric Holder, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi were in the crowd that filled the courtroom's 400 seats.

Outside the court building, about 100 supporters of the law walked in a circle holding signs that read, "Protect my healthcare," and chanting, "Care for you, care for me, care for every family."

A half-dozen opponents shouted, "We love the Constitution!"

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum was there, too, declaring anew that GOP front-runner Mitt Romney has no standing to challenge Obama on the law since Massachusetts passed a somewhat similar version when Romney was governor.

Santorum said, "If you really want Obamacare repealed there's only one person who can make that happen."

A four-person student band from Howard University was part of the group favoring the law, playing New Orleans-style jazz tunes.

The law, much of which has still to take effect, would require almost all Americans to obtain health insurance and would extend coverage to more than 30 million people who now lack it.

The law would be the largest expansion in the nation's social safety net in more than four decades.

People hoping for a glimpse of the action had waited in line all weekend for the relatively few seats open to the public.

The justices allotted the case six hours of argument time, the most since the mid-1960s.

Nurses Lauri Lineweaver and Laura Brennaman, who are completing doctoral degrees, had been waiting since noon Sunday and got tickets to see arguments.

"It's an honor to be in the court," said Lineweaver, 35.

The court will release audio recordings of the arguments on the same day they take place.

The first time that happened was when the court heard argument in the Bush v. Gore case that settled the 2000 presidential election.

The last occasion was the argument in the Citizens United case that wound up freeing businesses from longstanding limits on political spending.

Outside groups filed a record 136 briefs on various aspects of the court case.

The first arguments Monday concern whether the challenge is premature under a 19th century tax law because the insurance requirement doesn't kick in until 2014 and people who remain uninsured wouldn't have to pay a penalty until they file their 2014 income taxes in early 2015.

Taking this way out of the case would relieve the justices of rendering a decision in political high season, just months before the presidential election.

The biggest issue before the court is Tuesday's argument over the constitutionality of the individual insurance requirement.

The states and the National Federation of Independent Business say Congress lacked authority under the Constitution for its unprecedented step of forcing Americans to buy insurance whether they want it or not.

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. »

Would you like to contribute to this story? Join the discussion.

Recommended For You
comments powered by Disqus