Gordon Peterson Blog Subscribe To This Blog
Friday March 21, 2008 at 3:44 pm
“The Speech”


In his Friday, March 21, 2008 column, entitled, “The Speech: A Brilliant Fraud,” Inside Washington panelist Charles Krauthammer asks why Barack Obama did not or does not leave Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church following revelations about Wright’s inflammatory remarks. Krauthammer says the speech is, “…the Jesse Jackson politics of racial grievance expressed in Ivy League diction and Harvard Law nuance.” He adds, “That’s why the speech made so many liberal commentators swoon: It bathed them in racial guilt while flattering their intellectual pretensions. An unbeatable combination.” 

The other Inside Washington panelists, Washington Post columnist Colbert King, NPR’s Nina Totenberg and columnist Mark Shields, do not agree. Shields argues that the Obama speech is a profound political statement, tackling complex social issues that other politicians would run from. 

Several Washington political junkies with whom I have spoken since Obama made his speech, are of the opinion that for Obama to have cut his friend, former pastor and spiritual mentor loose after a relationship spanning more than two decades would have been an act of political cowardice.

“I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother,” Obama said, “a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”

Charles Krauthammer argues that Obama’s grandma gets a bad rap in that speech, that she never spread racial hatred as he alleges Rev. Wright did.

My question: Will Rev. Wright prove to be Barack Obama’s political Achilles heel? Even a cursory perusal of the internet on the subject reveals that there are those who are trying desperately to make it so.
If you haven’t seen or read the full speech click below to take you to the ABC News web site.

“Full Remarks: Obama’s speech on race and religion.”

Your Name
(appears on your post)
For security reasons, please type in the above letters



Please leave your comments below:

Comments on “The Speech”
Clifford
The Inside Washington March 30, 2008 broadcast was shockingly biased in favor of Obama and against Clinton. All four panalishts were effusive in their praise of Obama and uniformly hostile to Clinton. Evan Thomas in particular was extremely hostile to Clinton. It was hypocritical of him to aggressively challenge Senator Clinton's judgment, while conveniently ignoring Obama's judgment in attending and supporting a church for 20 years with a provocative rascist, anti-American and anti-Semitic preacher. Obama had no problem exposing his children and hundreds or thousands of other childrent to Wright's hate-filled tirades. Being a PBS feature, Inside Washinton has an obligation to present a balance of views. Surely you can find panelists who are supportive of Senator Clinton and not in an Obama induced trance. If not, your show should not be on PBS.

Interesting
It is interesting how so many have come out against the words of the Reverend without even listening to even one of his whole sermons. Just today, I counseled a young woman who started to state that she could not vote for Obama because of what the Rev. said. I looked her in the eye and asked if she listened to one of his sermons and she said no. I told her to at least listen to a sermon before she makes her decision...you know an informed decision.

SC
Behind his obese conservatism, and objectivity-bending agenda and partisanship, I make out that CK is smart. But he should reread the speech or see it again, because he pitifully misses both its letter and spirit. How could one see "the Jesse Jackson politics of racial grievance" in that speech unless you are reading through a distorting prism?

Obama does not have the childhood background of a typical African-American. Not only because of his mother and her parents who raised him, but also because his father came directly from Kenya. Africans from Africa don't have the same outlook on slavery as most Afr. Americans. They don't have the kind of chip on their shoulders that Rev. Wright has. Also far from American realities was Obama's step-father. Finally, we have listened to Obama for a year now. Isn't it common sense for anyone steeped in American realities that this guy is speaking out of the typical African American mold? Is it not what millions of American observers see? Is it not that originality itself which has been making the man attractive to American voters who know their country and its men? Could Jessie Jackson have lasted a year in an election campaign with that success?

It would be nice to hear CK, one day, without that morbid prism.

JW
On your March 23 Inside Washington show, Charles Krauthammer stated that Rev Wright was ranting about blacks being infected with HIV by the whites. Did Charles forget about the syphilis experiments conducted on black men many years ago?

TM & © WJLA/NewsChannel 8, a division of Allbritton Communications Company
Please read our Privacy Policy. By using this site, you accept our Terms of Service.
Children's Television | EEO Reports | DTV Consumer Education Reports
WJLA adheres to the ICRA RATING SYSTEM