Gordon Peterson Blog Subscribe To This Blog
Thursday March 06, 2008 at 10:12 am
The Fight of the Century (The 21st Century)
category: Politics


Muhammad Ali was a spectacular athlete.  He had the fastest hands in the fight game and was so quick on his feet that he could dance away from the heaviest puncher at will.

But the question many boxing fans often asked was,“Can he take a punch?”

They had their answer at Madison Square Garden on March 8, 1971,  when Ali, an undefeated heavyweight champion who had been stripped of his title after refusing induction in the Army four years earlier,stepped into the ring with Joe Frazier, the current undefeated champion.

Frazier was a puncher. He had a killer left hook that in the 11th round knocked Ali into the ropes. It was a 15-round slug fest that has been called, “The Fight of the Century.  When it was over Joe Frazier, after taking a wicked amount of punishment himself,was still the champ.

But no one ever again questioned the great Ali’s ability to take a punch. 

The Clinton campaign has been complaining for weeks that the press has been giving Barack Obama a free ride.  Saturday Night Live, back in business after the writer’s strike, rode that theme relentlessly, as did the Clinton campaign’s media tough-guy Howard Wolfson.

Then came Clinton’s 3:00 AM red phone ad, followed by reporters’ questions to Obama about his relationship with his former Chicago fundraiser Tony Rezko, who went on trial this week for extortion  and influence-peddling. And Canada-gate. Was Obama saying one thing publicly and another privately to the Canadians on NAFTA? The Canadians say no. But Monday, in Texas,after a few minutes of pummeling by reporters,a rattled Obama threw in the towel and took a hike. It looked bad. Where was the cool, collected customer we had been watching in primary after primary? 

One more thing, on 60 minutes, Clinton told Steve Kroft there was no basis for saying that Obama is a Muslim, “as far as I know.” “As far as I know?” Excuse me? This is what Obama calls the Clinton kitchen sink strategy, and it may have cost him with voters who made up their minds in the last three days before Texas and Ohio. Obama is still ahead in delegates, after losing Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, and he has even regained some delegate ground in Texas, based on results from the caucuses, so I guess you could say he can take a punch. But can he throw one?

Can he head Clinton off at the pass as she tries to persuade super-delegates that she is the more electable Democrat?  Can he defeat her efforts to seat Florida and Michigan delegations? She won in both states after having promised not to campaign there and Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in Michigan.

Says Florida’s Republican Governor Charlie Crist, who’s backing John McCain, “I think it’s important that these delegates be seated. I’m hopeful that the National Democratic party comes to the conclusion that it’s the right thing to do.” Thank you, Charlie. That’s very helpful. And the longer Clinton and Obama are in the ring slugging it out, the happier  Charlie Crist  and his fellow Republicans will be.

Your Name
(appears on your post)
For security reasons, please type in the above letters



Please leave your comments below:

Comments on The Fight of the Century (The 21st Century)
Rita Crawford
I was trying to send a comment to Gordon Petersen regarding the discussion they had on Inside Washington, March 9. The discussion was that the Senator Clinton argument regarding her "Big States" wins is not a strong argument. Since they deny bias, I can only assume they are weak reporters. A little hard work would find that Hillary Clinton would probably have over a 100 more elected delegates and be neck and neck in delegate count if the Democratic party did not use a voting system that disenfranchises voters - caucus.

They should point out that caucuses favor people who can sit around for hours at a time and wait to vote. These people tend to be students and well off elites. Workers with shift or evening work, parents, seniors - all have caucuses methodology against them. Not to say it doesn't happen but statistically speaking a caucus does not represnt the wishes of the entire state ( a look at Texas will prove that; Clinton won the state but with the caucus system, will probably lose the delagates).

So an agrument that says do you really want your candidate to represnt such a small portion of the voters is a strong argument. I also want to point out that many of these caucus states are republican and a Democrat will probably not win them in the primary. That means something and SuperDelagates should pay attention to these details.

Also, what about the DNC crying "the rules are the rules" regarding Florida and Michigan? That is leadership? They make a dunder head decision that disenfranchises Florida and Michigan and they say that is the rules. What kind of rule is that? Sounds like the rules that said blacks could not vote; it was a rule. Fortunately some leaders understood that bad rules are bad and should be removed. How could a Democratic party ever disenfranchise a whole state because of the date of their primary (a date set by a Republican lead legislature). Seat the delegates. .

I am not sure I want to be a Democrat with all this disenfranchising of voters and all this crying about false rules. The only rules are that everyone should be able to vote, the press should be fair in coverage

Thank you

Norine
I have been watching the news and only see Hillary aligning herself with powerplayer hoping to steal the election.

This is not right for the news media not go give Obama his coverage to address the issues. The media is being unfair and trying to help her steal the election rather than tell her to close up shop, because she is already defeated and cant win the popular vote.

Your station is showing your partiality and trying to skew the election by not giving Obama his chance to address the public on his position on the election outcome.

You are allowing Hillary to try & steal the election and the public will not stand for this. This is not the time for a major civil upheaval, especially during our economic crisis. Be fair.

TM & © WJLA/NewsChannel 8, a division of Allbritton Communications Company
Please read our Privacy Policy. By using this site, you accept our Terms of Service.
Children's Television | EEO Reports | DTV Consumer Education Reports
WJLA adheres to the ICRA RATING SYSTEM