Keyword Search:
text size: A | A | A
Kaine: State Still Fighting for Dulles Extension
   posted 2:25 pm Mon February 04, 2008 - Richmond, Va.
Virginia Governor Timothy Kaine is willing to discuss tweaking plans for the long-awaited extension of Metrorail to Dulles International Airport if it leads to federal funding.

Kaine and members of the Virginia congressional delegation discussed the $5 billion project during a meeting in Richmond on Monday.

The Federal Transit Administration says the northern Virginia rail project would not qualify for critical federal funding without major changes.

ABC 7 News myTAKE - What's Your Opinion?Kaine said the project could go forward without federal cash, but it could mean raising money through things like tolls.

Kaine said he's in talks with federal officials to salvage the project and would be "willing to entertain adjustments" to current plans.
Latest Comment on Kaine: State Still Fighting for Dulles Extension
Lincolnia
Both John61 and Katiebear make good points. What we are talking about is a ?modern day re-discovering of the wheel?. Gee, there was rail from Rosslyn (Key Bridge) thru Leesburg to Bluemont in the 20's, 30' and 40's. What now remains of this rail are sections of a flat 45 mile rail-bed that is a bike/jogging/running path through Arlington, Fairfax and Loudoun. As John61 points out the projected cost is outrageous with increased taxes, fees and assessments. As Katiebear points out MetroRail is (and has been needed) to Dulles. If construction was started 15 years ago, we would not be where we are now.

Another part of what Virginia, DC and Maryland really needs is an outer beltway and/or a regional bypass to bypass North-South bound truck and other long-haul traffic outside of the current 495/95 beltway. Take that traffic off the beltway and the current number of lanes will be good for the next 20 years.

John61 makes another important point: Electric (derived from coal generation plants) is needed to run the rail and feed the construction sprawl. ?Coal is one of the worst things for the environment.? The US is way behind in bringing on-line next-generation nuclear power plants. The average American will not understand this until they go to the light switch and nothing happens. On the other hand it may be better, in the short-run, to burn American coal rather than imported petroleum. But nuclear power is the long-term answer.

     
»
 read all comments
You need to be a registered member of
ABC 7 News to leave comments on news stories.
Not a member yet? Click Here to sign up.
Username or Email Address
Password
Please leave your comments below:
Messages that harass, abuse or threaten other members; have obscene or otherwise objectionable content; have spam, commercial or advertising content or inappropriate links may be removed and may result in the loss of your posting privileges. Please do not post any private information unless you want it to be available publicly. Never assume that you are completely anonymous and cannot be identified by your posts.


TM & © WJLA/NewsChannel 8, a division of Allbritton Communications Company
Please read our Privacy Policy. By using this site, you accept our Terms of Service.
Children's Television | EEO Reports | WJLA adheres to the ICRA RATING SYSTEM